Shri Ram Sena members on the evening of 24th January 2009 barged into a Mangalore pub and assaulted the girls in there. They justified the incident by stating the girls flouted the traditional Indian norms and levels of decency. Excuse me?
And then Mr.Pramod Muthalik, founder of this organization, had the nerve to say, "its a small incident" and that they were "trying to save women from bad influence". Yo dude from the angel world, we can think for ourselves and can distinguish between what a good influence is and whats not. We don't need a fundamentalist coming up to us and teaching us the rules to live.
He also said that the media is trying to politicize the whole issue by targeting BJP. BJP? Politics? How on earth is politics related to this???
Mr Pramod Muthalik, if your men can come and attack women to "save them from bad influence", the next time I find a man peeing on the road, Am I justified to go and hit him on his head?
You don't resort to violence. Even a 2 year old kid will tell you that. You and your party people seem to lack common sense.
Mr Angel also said "the intentions were right but the method was wrong".
Lets compare this to 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Terrorists barge into the hotels. And the rest is history. Even the terrorists can justify themselves by saying our intentions were right but methods were wrong.
Shame on us. We need no terrorists. We can create havoc in our own country. Indians beat up fellow Indians and then give a justification for it. Its such a disgrace.
6 comments:
Ram Sena tarnishes the very morals Sri Rama stood for. If they really wanna save women from the so called 'bad' influence, let them take it up with the women's rights or moral police and come to a consensus. basically i feel its a move to tell shiv sena 'look ppl, we exist too'
and one more thing, indians who beat up indians in the name of maintaining culture etc aren't indians at all. india stands for secularism and sovereignty : are we truly so? Govt is in the hands of self-centred ppl; and religion is used to get many a thing done. its high time we started taking these words beyond just the preamble of our constitution
Sri Ram Sena are a bunch of pathological lunatics just like some feudal goons seeking violence and attention in media.
If hooliganism, street violence, moral policing and taking law into their hands are signs of taliban, then let us see who all qualify to be termed as Taliban.
1) Mamita Benerjee dragged a SP MP by collar in Indian parliament. Has not she taken law into her hands and was as violent as Sri Ram Sena in the middle of India Parliament?
She is female Taliban according to the definition applied to "Sri Ram Sena".
2) Both Renuka Choudhury and Uma Bharati are accused of publicly slapping men (we have seen videos), they both are taliban as well.
So, what moral authority Renuka has got? He herself is partly responsible for harassment, arrest of 1,23,000 women with out investigation under one single IPC.
She needs attention, which her father or bf never seemed to have given.
3) Women's organisations attacked arrack sellers and husbands in south India, they are also taliban.
Banning liquor is taken from south Indian feminist text books only.
If liquor is injurious to social life in rural India, then it is equally injurious to social life in urban India as well. One guy being drunk killed 4 people just 3 km from my home in Bangalore.
4) Couple of women's organisations broke furniture in Delhi High court opposing whistle blower justice JD Kapoor's 2003 statement that "Dowry law is misused". A lot of misery would have been averted if these Taliban were arrested and punished severely in 2003 itself.
They are also Taliban.
5) Sri Ram sena called the girls prostitutes.
At 20% of 1,23,000 women were threatened about false cases of "prostitution" in Indian police stations when they were arrested under 498a.
----------
If Sri Ram Sena is Taliban, then Indian Police is also Taliban. Ban Indian Police.
----------
The Sri Ram Sena are just like children in comparison to the violent behaviour shown by Indian Feminists, Indian police and women's organisations.
=========
There is no difference between women's organisations and Sri Ram Sena. Both want to oppose "drinking" by beating up the sellers and customers. Both are Taliban.
=========
1) If a man drinks, he is a drunkard.
If a female drinks, then she is liberal.
2) Drinking in Pub is social service.
Drinking Arrack in village is criminal activity.
3) Arrack sellers have to be attacked.
Pub owners have to be given Ashok Chakra.
Only Urban morons have right to drink and murder people on road.
What a double standard?
=======
Sri Ram Sena has to be banned, because they are Taliban.
Before that ban all other hardened Taliban, who slap men in public, attacked arrack shops, broke furniture in courts, lied and mislead the country.
Ban Renuka, ban Mamita, BAN AIDWA.
BAN Indian police, for calling innocent women prostitutes.
Ban UNICEF. Ban UNIFEM.
If terrorist Taliban Sri Ram Sena and extortinist police and taliban women's organisations are not banned, then people must be allowed to take law into their hands and beat up all these terrorists.
Some 20 women are beaten and molested in Mangalore.
The crimes committed by Indian police and UNIFEM funded feminists on Indian women (also men) are much bigger. Ban them all.
-------
If a male MP dragged a female MP by collar in the parliament, has society reacted in the same casual way?
If a male MP or politician slapped a female in public view, has the society reacted casually?
===========
Crime has no gender.
The social double standards are very clear.
Female criminals get away, where as male criminals are put in jail.
Today, being a female taliban is fashionable. After slapping men, these bitches are giving sermons on civilised behaviour.
Save Indian family
Certainly crime doesn't have gender. Anybody resorting to violence is at fault. There is a certain civilized way to express anger and to protest. What Sri Ram Sena did was not right. No human, irrespective of caste, creed, colour or gender, has the right to physically abuse another human.
Shri Ram Sena says pubbing is against Hindu culture and values. But what they did was against the basic human values.
@Ashwin:
Very true Ashwin. The fundamental values of an Indian is getting corroded. We're turning back into animals.
it is so damn clear that these ppl with name "ram sena" are doin things they shudn do n makin wrong use of the authority given to them.
I feel these ppl r tarnishing our culture in the name of Lord Rama. Lord Rama r whoever it maybe never preached violence n our culture always respects women. Moreover y these ppl have to target women alone, when there is so much crime happening in the society. India, a country of great tradition n values is not so anymore,coz ppl r gradually forgetting their roots. So some awareness has to be created abt our origin which is supposed to be the job of these senas but they do everything else other than that.They r actually a disgrace to the Hindu religion itself as they r no less than jihadi organisations. Before any religion, comes humanity which should be respected first. Anyways all these senas do these things for gaining publicity n to exhibit power. Today anyone can form his/her own sena,its just as easy as that.Anybody can do anything n escape from it. I suggest having a proper, non-corrupt government at the first place may be a solution to certain extent.
Post a Comment